146.
proccess upon tin different grounds
which
189.
may
be noticed separ
eparately.
is that the
fit
to
be
The first ground.
petition is not in a state
received because it does not bear a
#2 adhesive revenue stamp, and the second is that the petition has not
the seal
of
the Court affixed I have inquired of the acting Registions whether there is any rule acerings to which
a
tipendie p. 18.
fee of $2. is
4
interlocutory petitions in
Debtors Act
14
346
of 1846 which wonder rule so
30
of the present banteruplex Rules might
be held
ti
govern and there
I find
aming
the loust peer specified.
For filing every petition and Evidence
in support there of
Thennap $1.
I k
QCC i v
very doubtful whether this is intended to
apply to
arry
thing brit the Original
petition for adjudication.
The Acting Requations procher
Says
"Mo pees
interloentory petitions
" used to be charged in Ms. Alesante's
only
since the Supreme
"Court Commission that they have been
payable
4
bantupley
he replies
that he does
"time, and it is
перего
me
to
the schedule
of
the old Insolvent
reed" and her
refers
to seven
petitions
Leblers
not know of any writtennis let he
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.